THE MW DESK / BLOG
What Q4 2026 Is Telling You About 2027 Pricing
Record construction, 1.4% vacancy, GS-5 minima, Texas pause risk, 160-week transformers and hyperscaler credit wraps. Directional rents stay firm where power is real. Speculative shells pay in coupon, not in asking rate.
Pricing in this market is not one number. It is three: the lease rate for energized capacity, the all-in power and tariff stack, and the cost of capital for the shell that is not yet leased. Q4 2026 is sending a clear signal on all three for 2027.
Lease rates: scarcity has not broken
CBRE’s H1 2026 primary-market vacancy sat at 1.4% after record construction. Eighty percent of capacity under construction was preleased. Northern Virginia asking rates for 10 MW-plus requirements ran about $160–$185 per kW-month with 0.24% vacancy and 10.8 MW available. Atlanta’s 10 MW-plus rates were up 14.5% in the half. New York–New Jersey led primary markets with a 19% jump in that tier. Pricing pressure was moving down the size curve too — average asking rates up across 250 kW to 10 MW-plus bands (Data Center Frontier / CBRE).
Nothing in the November tape — midterm bans, Texas pause politics, equipment backlogs — points to a 2027 vacancy surge large enough to reverse that. If anything, political friction removes marginal supply. Directional ranges on The MW Desk’s market pages for Q4 2026 still describe major metros as tight to extremely tight, with immediate powered shell scarce and hyperscale bands generally in the low-to-mid hundreds of dollars per kW-month depending on market. Those figures are rounded directional estimates, not broker quotes, and they move (The MW Desk markets).
Base case for 2027 lease pricing in constrained primary markets: firm to higher for deliverable, liquid-ready wholesale. Softness, if it appears, shows up first in non-powered land, air-cooled remnant and politically blocked pipeline — not in energized NOVA or Atlanta halls.
Power stack: minima raise the floor
Dominion’s GS-5 class starts January 1, 2027 with 14-year commitments and minimum demand charges for large loads. APS is using collateral and exit fees. Colo take-or-pay floors of 60%–85% are spreading. All-in $/kW for a careful buyer is lease plus utility minima plus any behind-the-meter fuel and operations (Dominion; CBRE via DCF).
2027 budgets that still assume flexible ramp and easy contraction will miss. The floor is rising even when the energy commodity price does not.
Cost of capital: two markets, two coupons
Google backstopping TeraWulf’s Anthropic campus is the cheap-debt template: tenant plus hyperscaler wrapper plus executable EPC. Caterpillar’s $78 billion backlog and Eaton’s Electrical backlog up 46% say the physical build remains funded at the equipment layer. The Bank of England querying untenanted UK loans, and CoreWeave’s mid-teens unsecured yields earlier in the fall, say speculative shells pay a different price — or wait (DCD / Utility Dive / Eaton).
So 2027 “pricing” for developers is bifurcated. Pre-leased, credit-wrapped projects clear. Empty shells finance like stressed credit. That bifurcation will show up in which campuses actually pour concrete next year.
The overlays that can still break a bull case
Texas approvals may stay paused into the 2027 legislative session. Ohio-style local bans can delete entitled land after the model is built. Transformer lead times past 160 weeks and electrician shortages can slip CODs even when the lease is signed. Any of those can convert a 2027 delivery into a 2028 problem and force a buyer onto the spot market at worse rates.
The hedge is not a lower asking-rate forecast. The hedge is contracted power, reserved electrical gear, named crews and political diligence.
A simple 2027 playbook
For buyers: contract deliverable MW with dated COD, liquid-cooling readiness and utility minimums modeled in the total cost. Pay up for certainty in NOVA, Atlanta and other sub-2% vacancy markets. Avoid betting the roadmap on politically paused pipeline.
For builders: prelease deeper, reserve transformers and switchgear now, staff electrical packages early, and bring political diligence into site selection. Empty speculative shells will struggle to clear financing next to wrapped, tenanted deals.
For capital: separate scarcity rents (supported) from untenanted development IRRs (pressured). Equipment and utility names levered to contracted backlog remain tied to multi-year build programs; developer equity without leases or wrappers faces a higher hurdle rate. None of that is a price target. It is a map of where the tape already split.
What to watch into year-end and Q1
- H2 vacancy and preleasing prints from CBRE and peers.
- First GS-5 contracts and any NOVA velocity change after January 1.
- Texas audit findings and early Hinojosa actions.
- 2027 COD slip disclosures that name gear or labor.
- Credit spreads on wrapped developer paper versus untenanted vehicles.
Why it matters for builders, buyers and investors
Builders should sell certainty — COD, power, cooling — not square footage. Buyers should budget higher all-in floors and pay for delivery insurance. Investors should separate scarcity rents (still supported) from speculative development IRR (under pressure). Q4’s message for 2027 is not “the boom is over.” It is “only the contracted boom gets financed and energized.”
Not investment advice. Directional market ranges cited from The MW Desk are indicative only.
Sources
- https://www.datacenterfrontier.com/site-selection/news/55401462/cbre-record-data-center-construction-fails-to-ease-capacity-crunch ↗
- https://www.utilitydive.com/news/caterpillar-posts-highest-sales-quarter-ever-data-centers-q3-2026/873586/ ↗
- https://www.eaton.com/us/en-us/company/news-insights/news-releases/2026/eaton-reports-record-third-quarter-2026-results.html ↗
- https://www.texastribune.org/2026/11/04/data-center-texas-pause-gina-hinojosa-governor-policies/ ↗
- https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/google-to-serve-as-credit-backstop-for-terawulf-data-center-in-kentucky/ ↗
- https://themwdesk.com/markets/ ↗
- https://sustainability.dominionenergy.com/GS-5%20Large%20Load%20Rate%20Class%20Report.pdf ↗